IPCC CLIMATE CHANGE REPORT REFUTED
Matthew 24:4
"And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you."
On a previous broadcast, we told you about the IPCC report designed to frighten people with dire warnings about the destruction of our planet if the world's governments don't take serious measures now to combat man-made global warming.
On the same day that the IPCC released its report, another report was released that you probably haven't heard about. The 1,068-page report was produced by the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change, a group founded in 2003 by distinguished atmospheric physicist S. Fred Singer. The report looks at each claim made in the IPCC report and refutes it thoroughly, using real climate data that was either ignored or misrepresented by the IPCC.
Joseph L. Bast, publisher of the Climate Change Reconsidered series, wrote: "We know the authors of the IPCC's reports have financial conflicts of interest, since the government bureaucracies that select them and the UN that oversees and edits the final reports stand to profit from public alarm over the possibility that global warming will be harmful."
Creation Moments sees many parallels between climate change and evolution. Both are fueled by financial gain and faulty worldviews. Both attempt to silence the opposition by claiming they are dealing with "settled science." Both ridicule those who disagree with them. Both ignore data that doesn't support their claims. When you remove all the smoke, mirrors and shoddy science, both are intended to deceive. Thankfully, God has given His people eyes that can detect lies. Use them!
Lord Jesus, I know that there are many deceivers in the world, driven by personal gain and the lust for power. I pray that You will help me see things through Your eyes so I can distinguish truth from error. In Your Name. Amen.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2014/03/31/the-ipccs-latest-report-deliberately-excludes-and-misrepresents-important-climate-science/. "The IPCC's Latest Report Deliberately Excludes And Misrepresents Important Climate Science," Forbes, 3/31/14. Photo: Courtesy of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change. Their report is available for free at http://climatechangereconsidered.org/.
Matthew 24:4
"And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you."
On a previous broadcast, we told you about the IPCC report designed to frighten people with dire warnings about the destruction of our planet if the world's governments don't take serious measures now to combat man-made global warming.
On the same day that the IPCC released its report, another report was released that you probably haven't heard about. The 1,068-page report was produced by the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change, a group founded in 2003 by distinguished atmospheric physicist S. Fred Singer. The report looks at each claim made in the IPCC report and refutes it thoroughly, using real climate data that was either ignored or misrepresented by the IPCC.
Joseph L. Bast, publisher of the Climate Change Reconsidered series, wrote: "We know the authors of the IPCC's reports have financial conflicts of interest, since the government bureaucracies that select them and the UN that oversees and edits the final reports stand to profit from public alarm over the possibility that global warming will be harmful."
Creation Moments sees many parallels between climate change and evolution. Both are fueled by financial gain and faulty worldviews. Both attempt to silence the opposition by claiming they are dealing with "settled science." Both ridicule those who disagree with them. Both ignore data that doesn't support their claims. When you remove all the smoke, mirrors and shoddy science, both are intended to deceive. Thankfully, God has given His people eyes that can detect lies. Use them!
Lord Jesus, I know that there are many deceivers in the world, driven by personal gain and the lust for power. I pray that You will help me see things through Your eyes so I can distinguish truth from error. In Your Name. Amen.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2014/03/31/the-ipccs-latest-report-deliberately-excludes-and-misrepresents-important-climate-science/. "The IPCC's Latest Report Deliberately Excludes And Misrepresents Important Climate Science," Forbes, 3/31/14. Photo: Courtesy of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change. Their report is available for free at http://climatechangereconsidered.org/.
CLIMATE CHANGE REPORT RELEASED ONE DAY TOO EARLY
Genesis 8:22
"While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease."
On the last day of March, 2014, the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) issued a report warning that the effects of climate change are already occurring on all continents. They went on to predict that mankind would face catastrophic consequences if we don't take drastic measures right now. But as you'll see in a moment, the report was released one day too early.
Why do we say that? Because April 1st would have been a far more suitable date for a foolish announcement with no substance to back it up. The announcement was a brash attempt to "sell" climate change by stressing the sheer number of "experts" who prepared the report.
Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the IPCC, stressed that "none of this [the report] would be possible without the dedication of the Co-Chairs of Working Group II and the hundreds of scientists and experts who volunteered their time to produce this report, as well as the more than 1,700 expert reviewers worldwide who contributed their invaluable oversight."
After the IPCC was caught cooking the books in November of 2009, in 2011 and on other occasions, Creation Moments can't help but be skeptical of any report that tries to convince us it is true by citing the number of scientists who participated in its preparation. The truth is, there are thousands of scientists who are skeptical of man-made climate change. But like creationists, they are ignored and ridiculed.
Heavenly Father, I know that so-called climate change is not something to be feared. I also know I can trust You to preserve our planet until the day that Your Son returns. In Jesus' Name. Amen.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/03/140331100633.htm. Photo: Smog in New York City as viewed from the World Trade Center in 1988.
Genesis 8:22
"While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease."
On the last day of March, 2014, the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) issued a report warning that the effects of climate change are already occurring on all continents. They went on to predict that mankind would face catastrophic consequences if we don't take drastic measures right now. But as you'll see in a moment, the report was released one day too early.
Why do we say that? Because April 1st would have been a far more suitable date for a foolish announcement with no substance to back it up. The announcement was a brash attempt to "sell" climate change by stressing the sheer number of "experts" who prepared the report.
Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the IPCC, stressed that "none of this [the report] would be possible without the dedication of the Co-Chairs of Working Group II and the hundreds of scientists and experts who volunteered their time to produce this report, as well as the more than 1,700 expert reviewers worldwide who contributed their invaluable oversight."
After the IPCC was caught cooking the books in November of 2009, in 2011 and on other occasions, Creation Moments can't help but be skeptical of any report that tries to convince us it is true by citing the number of scientists who participated in its preparation. The truth is, there are thousands of scientists who are skeptical of man-made climate change. But like creationists, they are ignored and ridiculed.
Heavenly Father, I know that so-called climate change is not something to be feared. I also know I can trust You to preserve our planet until the day that Your Son returns. In Jesus' Name. Amen.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/03/140331100633.htm. Photo: Smog in New York City as viewed from the World Trade Center in 1988.
EARTHWORM OR DRAINING BATHTUB?
Psalm 22:6
"But I am a worm, and no man; a reproach of men, and despised of the people."
What creature lives deep underground, has a dark purple head and a blue-grey body, can grow up to nine feet in length and sounds like a bathtub draining of water? It's the Giant Gippsland earthworm of Australia, of course!
As these incredible creatures make their way through the soil, they shorten in length and then stretch their body to as long as fourteen feet. Despite their size, it is very difficult to study these giant earthworms because they never come to the surface unless flushed out by heavy rains. They prefer to spend their lives deep underground where they won't be cut to pieces by farmers tilling the ground.
"Burrows that are occupied by giant Gippsland earthworms have very wet walls," said Beverley D. Van Praagh, a biologist who has studied the creatures for over 20 years. "When the earthworms move quickly within their burrows, it makes a gurgling sound that is quite loud and can be heard above ground. The sound is a bit like water draining out of a bath and has been known to terrify the uninitiated."
Though most of us look at such creatures with disgust, nothing that God has made is without purpose. Earthworms perform a very valuable service in making the soil fertile. Life on earth would not exist without the lowly earthworm! Eternal life, too, wouldn't exist were it not for Jesus, who is called a worm and was despised by the people He came to save.
Heavenly Father, I thank You for Jesus, the lowly "worm" rejected by men but who is now exalted at Your right side in heaven. Amen.
http://www.wired.com/2014/03/absurd-creature-week-earthworm-backup/. Wired online, 3/28/14. Photo: Courtesy of Beverley D. Van Praagh.
Psalm 22:6
"But I am a worm, and no man; a reproach of men, and despised of the people."
What creature lives deep underground, has a dark purple head and a blue-grey body, can grow up to nine feet in length and sounds like a bathtub draining of water? It's the Giant Gippsland earthworm of Australia, of course!
As these incredible creatures make their way through the soil, they shorten in length and then stretch their body to as long as fourteen feet. Despite their size, it is very difficult to study these giant earthworms because they never come to the surface unless flushed out by heavy rains. They prefer to spend their lives deep underground where they won't be cut to pieces by farmers tilling the ground.
"Burrows that are occupied by giant Gippsland earthworms have very wet walls," said Beverley D. Van Praagh, a biologist who has studied the creatures for over 20 years. "When the earthworms move quickly within their burrows, it makes a gurgling sound that is quite loud and can be heard above ground. The sound is a bit like water draining out of a bath and has been known to terrify the uninitiated."
Though most of us look at such creatures with disgust, nothing that God has made is without purpose. Earthworms perform a very valuable service in making the soil fertile. Life on earth would not exist without the lowly earthworm! Eternal life, too, wouldn't exist were it not for Jesus, who is called a worm and was despised by the people He came to save.
Heavenly Father, I thank You for Jesus, the lowly "worm" rejected by men but who is now exalted at Your right side in heaven. Amen.
http://www.wired.com/2014/03/absurd-creature-week-earthworm-backup/. Wired online, 3/28/14. Photo: Courtesy of Beverley D. Van Praagh.
EVOLUTIONISTS DESPISE THIS WOLF
1 Thessalonians 5:21
"Prove all things; hold fast that which is good."
Meet Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig, a brilliant scientist who worked at the Max-Planck Institute until his retirement. Though he has written four books on the subject of evolution, he has infuriated evolutionists everywhere by daring to challenge Neo-Darwinism on scientific grounds.
He told the Diplomacy Post in March 2014: "A scientific hypothesis should be potentially falsifiable.... However," he added, "the idea of slow evolution by 'infinitesimally small inherited variations' etc. has been falsified by the findings of palaeontology... as well [as] genetics. Yet its adherents principally reject any scientific proof against Neo-Darwinism," he said, "so that, in fact, their theory has become a non-falsifiable worldview, to which people stick in spite of all contrary evidence."
Scientists continue to support evolution despite the evidence that actually falsified evolution because "without Darwinism, philosophic materialism has lost its battle against an intelligent origin of the world."
But Wolf had more to say. "According to Neo-Darwinism, all important problems of the origin of species are, at least in principle, solved. Further questions on the validity of evolutionary theory are thus basically superfluous. However, such a dogmatic attitude stops further investigations and hinders fruitful research in science."
Though Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig has stopped short of giving recognition to God as the Intelligent Designer, we applaud his work for showing that evolution doesn't even deserve to be called scientific.
Father, I pray for Intelligent Design proponents. Though they understand that the creation requires an intelligent designer, many of them still don't realize that the Intelligent Designer is You! In Jesus' Name. Amen.
http://dippost.com/2014/03/22/wolf-ekkehard-lonnig-complex-systems-in-biology-overwhelmingly-point-to-an-intelligent-origin-of-living-beings/. "Lönnig: Complex systems in nature point to an intelligent origin for life", Diplomacy Post, 3/22/14. Photo: From Diplomacy Post. online used for educational purposes under U.S. fair use doctrine.
1 Thessalonians 5:21
"Prove all things; hold fast that which is good."
Meet Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig, a brilliant scientist who worked at the Max-Planck Institute until his retirement. Though he has written four books on the subject of evolution, he has infuriated evolutionists everywhere by daring to challenge Neo-Darwinism on scientific grounds.
He told the Diplomacy Post in March 2014: "A scientific hypothesis should be potentially falsifiable.... However," he added, "the idea of slow evolution by 'infinitesimally small inherited variations' etc. has been falsified by the findings of palaeontology... as well [as] genetics. Yet its adherents principally reject any scientific proof against Neo-Darwinism," he said, "so that, in fact, their theory has become a non-falsifiable worldview, to which people stick in spite of all contrary evidence."
Scientists continue to support evolution despite the evidence that actually falsified evolution because "without Darwinism, philosophic materialism has lost its battle against an intelligent origin of the world."
But Wolf had more to say. "According to Neo-Darwinism, all important problems of the origin of species are, at least in principle, solved. Further questions on the validity of evolutionary theory are thus basically superfluous. However, such a dogmatic attitude stops further investigations and hinders fruitful research in science."
Though Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig has stopped short of giving recognition to God as the Intelligent Designer, we applaud his work for showing that evolution doesn't even deserve to be called scientific.
Father, I pray for Intelligent Design proponents. Though they understand that the creation requires an intelligent designer, many of them still don't realize that the Intelligent Designer is You! In Jesus' Name. Amen.
http://dippost.com/2014/03/22/wolf-ekkehard-lonnig-complex-systems-in-biology-overwhelmingly-point-to-an-intelligent-origin-of-living-beings/. "Lönnig: Complex systems in nature point to an intelligent origin for life", Diplomacy Post, 3/22/14. Photo: From Diplomacy Post. online used for educational purposes under U.S. fair use doctrine.
CREATION IS A SCIENTIFIC FACT
Genesis 1:3
"And God said, Let there be light: and there was light."
In March of 2014 a team of scientists headed by astronomer John M. Kovac of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics announced that they had finally found the evidence they were seeking to support the theory that the universe had a beginning.
This news about the Big Bang caused physics professor Nathan Aviezer of Bar Ilan University to say: "One thing the announcement does do is make it clear that the universe had a definite starting point - a creation - as described in the book of Genesis."
He went on to say, "The Torah quotes God as saying 'let there be light,' and science tells us that this light came into existence, exploding to create the universe as we know it. . At this point I think we can say that creation is a scientific fact. Without addressing who or what caused it, the mechanics of the creation process in the Big Bang match the Genesis story perfectly," he said. "If I had to make up a theory to match the first passages in Genesis, the Big Bang theory would be it."
Let us not forget, however, that the Big Bang theory is still just that - a theory - and there are many scientists who reject it. In fact, we will talk more about Big-Bang-denying scientists in a future broadcast. But for now we'll simply say that Big Bang or not, we rejoice that some scientists are coming to realize that the concept of a Creator is not anti-science.
Father, I pray that more unbelieving scientists would believe in You as a result of believing the Big Bang theory. I also pray they would come to You for salvation as a result of believing what Your Word so clearly reveals. Amen.
http://www.wnd.com/2014/03/physicist-big-bang-breakthrough-confirms-creation/#QbfYzKEROZZwR94k.99. Graphic: This detailed, all-sky picture of the infant universe was created from nine years of WMAP (Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe) data. It was published in 2012. Courtesy of NASA.
Genesis 1:3
"And God said, Let there be light: and there was light."
In March of 2014 a team of scientists headed by astronomer John M. Kovac of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics announced that they had finally found the evidence they were seeking to support the theory that the universe had a beginning.
This news about the Big Bang caused physics professor Nathan Aviezer of Bar Ilan University to say: "One thing the announcement does do is make it clear that the universe had a definite starting point - a creation - as described in the book of Genesis."
He went on to say, "The Torah quotes God as saying 'let there be light,' and science tells us that this light came into existence, exploding to create the universe as we know it. . At this point I think we can say that creation is a scientific fact. Without addressing who or what caused it, the mechanics of the creation process in the Big Bang match the Genesis story perfectly," he said. "If I had to make up a theory to match the first passages in Genesis, the Big Bang theory would be it."
Let us not forget, however, that the Big Bang theory is still just that - a theory - and there are many scientists who reject it. In fact, we will talk more about Big-Bang-denying scientists in a future broadcast. But for now we'll simply say that Big Bang or not, we rejoice that some scientists are coming to realize that the concept of a Creator is not anti-science.
Father, I pray that more unbelieving scientists would believe in You as a result of believing the Big Bang theory. I also pray they would come to You for salvation as a result of believing what Your Word so clearly reveals. Amen.
http://www.wnd.com/2014/03/physicist-big-bang-breakthrough-confirms-creation/#QbfYzKEROZZwR94k.99. Graphic: This detailed, all-sky picture of the infant universe was created from nine years of WMAP (Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe) data. It was published in 2012. Courtesy of NASA.
BE SURE TO CHECK OUT MY ALL NEW PROPHECY AND CREATION DESIGN WEBSITES. THERE IS A LOT TO SEE AND DO..........